Attention is currently required from: pespin.
3 comments:
File library/PCUIF_CodecPort.ttcn:
Patch Set #2, Line 217: pt.send(t_SD_PCUIF(conn_id, ts_PCUIF_DATA_REQ(bts_nr, 0, 0, 0, 0, PCU_IF_SAPI_AGCH_2, enc_PCUIF_agch(agch))));
shouldn't tbis be enc_PCUIF_agch2?
in this case not, there was no type record PCUIF_agch before. The same is the case for type record PCUIF_pch and enc_PCUIF_pch
Patch Set #2, Line 220: /* Exit early when the caller is not interested in the confirmation message */
I think you are mixing 2 things her: confirmation and wait_for_confirmation. […]
Done
File library/PCUIF_Types.ttcn:
Patch Set #2, Line 326: * data request (data_req) under SAPI PCU_IF_SAPI_AGCH_2. */
I wonder how do we properly enc/dec PCH and AGCH <v11 in here, since the records seem to apply to v1 […]
There was no extra record around the data. For the AGCH its just the mac block as it is. For the PCH we were prepending the first three IMSI digits and the TLLI manually.
To view, visit change 34066. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.