Attention is currently required from: neels.

View Change

2 comments:

• File library/PFCP_Templates.ttcn:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 418: function ts_PFCP_Session_Est_Req(charstring node_id, OCT8 cp_seid, Create_PDR_list create_pdr, Create_FAR_list create_far) return template PDU_PFCP {

    the thing that annoys me there is that universal-ctags in general does a good job of taging ttcn3, b […]

    I'm sorry but your personal tooling is not an acceptable motivation to avoid specifying template types properly, which affects everybody else.

    It shows a lot of errors and also makes stuff more difficult when using them due to constrictions.
    Think of it as if it was a const pointer mark, or a nullable pointer mark.

  • Patch Set #1, Line 460: function tr_PFCP_Session_Est_Resp(template OCT8 hdr_seid := ?) return template PDU_PFCP {

    why?

    Can it be "omit"? then "template (omit)", otherwise "template (present)". You see, they serve to actually provide information on what can be passed to it.

To view, visit change 28817. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.