Attention is currently required from: laforge, neels, pespin.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #4:

    So if it's not a lot of work, yes, having _uS granularity would be nice.

    In the case of `OSMO_TDEF_MS`, I am simply migrating this tdef API to use the **existing** `osmo_fsm_..._ms()` API. There is currently no `osmo_fsm_..._us()` API, so supporting `OSMO_TDEF_US` would mean adding the missing osmo_fsm API. This is indeed more work, and I don't think I can spend even more time on this.

To view, visit change 35466. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.