Attention is currently required from: jolly.

View Change

1 comment:

• File src/target/firmware/layer1/prim_rach.c:

  • Patch Set #5, Line 65: l1s.rach.uic < 0

    Is 0xff a valid UIC value? I guess not given that it's outside the value range of signed `int8_t`. Personally I would prefer an unsigned field, at least because it's easier to define it in TTCN-3 (no need to specify the negative integer encoding format).

To view, visit change 34482. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.