Attention is currently required from: falconia, fixeria, jolly, pespin.
View Change
1 comment:
File src/twjit.c:
Patch Set #2, Line 504: rtph = osmo_rtp_get_hdr(msg);
> I mean dropping ortp completely. I dislike the idea of maintaing both ortp and twrtp. […]
I wouldn't mind getting rid of ortp and switching to something else. However, there's of course always a risk of regressions or fall-out in some scenarios. The most challenging environments are likely those with satellite (and hence latency + jitter-heavy) back-haul of Abis or A, but then that's also where I'd expect commercial production deployments to use OSMUX instead of RTP anyway.
To view, visit change 39280. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia3be5834571ca18b68939abbcf1ce3a879156658
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39280
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas@eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas@eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:36:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de>