Attention is currently required from: jolly.
2 comments:
File src/libmsc/ran_peer.c:
so below, there is a priority: 1.msc_role 2.vgcs.bss 3.vgcs.cell.
When there is an active vgcs.bss connection, is it possible that something also adds an msc_role to the same conn, and then that hides the active VGCS from incoming messages, because msc_role outranks vgcs.bss?
I'm asking, because there are mechanisms where a subscriber re-uses an existing connection. For example, if some CM Service is already active (say USSD) and then also a call starts, then it opens another transaction on the same conn.
Also a Call Re-Establishment does some more aggressive re-using of transactions and conns.
Can this kind of thing happen at all, e.g. the active talker person happens to receive an SMS at the same time, and while the SMS is handled, an important VGCS message is lost?
Patch Set #14, Line 413: return
(now redundant)
To view, visit change 33504. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.