Attention is currently required from: msuraev.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #4:

    why exactly do we need this? Isn't sockaddr just some generic alias for all types of sockaddr?

    I guess you're worried that sokcaddr_storage might be larger than some of the other types and hence the other types (sockaddr_in, ...) cannot be type-cast + passed to the existing function for sockaddr_storage?

To view, visit change 28995. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.