Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
2 comments:
File src/osmo-bsc/paging.c:
Patch Set #1, Line 92: to_be_deleted->bts
Why not paging_bts->bts_statg? I see it's used above.
Because "paging_bts" is not a gsm_bts, but a struct gsm_bts_paging_state, so it would be paging_bts->bts->bts_statg. So it doesn't really matter, it's the same bts pointer in the end.
This is also confusing: above you're decrementing pending_requests_len via 'bts_entry', but here you […]
Same, bts_entry is struct gsm_bts_paging_state, which is basically "bts->paging".
To view, visit change 30277. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.