Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.

Patch set 1:Code-Review +1

View Change

1 comment:

• File src/common/rsl.c:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 635: lchan_deactivate

    I am wondering why can't we call `lchan_activate(lchan)` right after calling `lchan_deactivate(lchan)`? Perhaps because activation/deactivation is asynchronous for DSP based models and we're waiting for some kind of confirmation? Not blocking, just curious.

To view, visit change 34340. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.