osmith has uploaded this change for review.
abis_nm: don't compare assumed/reported features
Just log all reported features, instead of comparing them against an
expected set of features and logging mismatches. The point of reporting
features from the BTS at runtime is that the BSC can support various BTS
versions with various feature sets.
Related: SYS#5922, OS#5538
Change-Id: Ibd79bc7ef802d8e95e05d746df182ff974b78e29
---
M src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-bsc refs/changes/19/27919/1
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c
index 1c21bc2..f8e392e 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c
@@ -597,19 +597,17 @@
/* Check each BTS feature in the reported vector */
for (i = 0; i < len * 8; i++) {
- bool Frep = osmo_bts_has_feature(&bts->features, i);
- if (i >= _NUM_BTS_FEAT && Frep) {
+ if (!osmo_bts_has_feature(&bts->features, i))
+ continue;
+
+ if (i >= _NUM_BTS_FEAT) {
LOGPMO(&bts->mo, DNM, LOGL_NOTICE, "Get Attributes Response: "
"unknown feature 0x%02x. Consider upgrading osmo-bsc.\n", i);
continue;
}
- bool Fexp = osmo_bts_has_feature(&bts->model->features, i);
- if (!Frep && Fexp) {
- LOGPMO(&bts->mo, DNM, LOGL_NOTICE, "Get Attributes Response: "
- "reported feature '%s' is not supported, while we thought it is.\n",
- osmo_bts_features_name(i));
- }
+ LOGPMO(&bts->mo, DNM, LOGL_NOTICE, "Get Attributes Response: feature '%s' is supported\n",
+ osmo_bts_features_name(i));
}
}
To view, visit change 27919. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.