Attention is currently required from: fixeria.

View Change

1 comment:

• File msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 6815: BSSAP.send(ts_PDU_DTAP_MO(ts_CM_SERV_REQ(CM_TYPE_MO_SMS, mi)));

    I am trying to understand the TC scenario. […]

    the scenario is: a conn is already open (e.g. an earlier CM Service is ongoing).
    Then rx a second CM Service, but its mobile identity is wrong.
    Is the comment above not clear enough?

    The first IMSI is xxxx00094, the wrong one is xxxx99999.
    Could also be a TMSI, but code wise it's easier to create an IMSI that is always guaranteed to mismatch.

    The LU is just a necessary prelude to allow the first valid CM Service Request to begin.

To view, visit change 28048. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.