Attention is currently required from: pespin.
1 comment:
Patchset:
I would like to review this patch more carefully when I am back from vacation (next week), so please don't rush merging it. So far I had a quick look and I don't really understand/see what do we benefit from this refactoring.
From what I remember, I intentionally wanted to have the power control parameters separated from the power control state. And using the pointer allows to avoid memcpy()ing parameters which are identical for all lchans in 99% cases. I don't see how this pointer being `NULL` can crate problems in static mode: one shall simply never need to access dynamic power control parameters in static mode.
To view, visit change 41807. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.