Attention is currently required from: laforge.
1 comment:
File src/core/soft_uart.c:
Patch Set #2, Line 209: size_t osmo_soft_uart_tx(struct osmo_soft_uart *suart,
how does this reject any buffer overflows? It is difficult to manage transmission with a buffer, IM […]
For the record, we further discussed this proposal in the IRC and decided to go for it. Regarding the buffer overflow protection, note the `OSMO_MIN` in this function. The caller is currently expected to check the returned value, which can be equal to or less than the `data_len`.
To view, visit change 35044. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.