Patch Set 1:

Given that we don't know the origin of the ERROR INDication (whether it's coming from the MS, or the BTS itself), both GSM0808_CAUSE_{MS,BSS}_NOT_EQUIPPED values are kind of valid. My proposal is to expect either of the two possible values:

  f_exp_sapi_n_reject(3, (GSM0808_CAUSE_BSS_NOT_EQUIPPED,
                          GSM0808_CAUSE_MS_NOT_EQUIPPED), '10'B);

After all, what we want to verify here is the 'Control Channel type' bits.

Using that kind of templates gives a lot side effect problems because of call:
f_exp_sapi_n_reject() -> tr_BSSMAP_IE_Cause() -> f_tr_causeValue(), which then fails when resolving the value (due to not being "?"):
Dynamic test case error: Performing a valueof or send operation on a non-specific template of enumerated type @BSSMAP_Templates.myBSSMAP_Cause.

So I'm keeping the patch as is, since anyway we also use this same value in another test.

View Change

To view, visit change 26890. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.