Attention is currently required from: pespin.
Patch set 2:Code-Review -1
2 comments:
Commit Message:
it is fine for the BTS to ACK
the RSL CONNECT despite later on failing to connect the RSL link
Are you really sure? You're saying it's just setting the attributes, but in reality `rx_oml_ipa_rsl_connect()` does call `e1inp_ipa_bts_rsl_connect_n()` and checks the return value. You're also saying that "it can be replaced with SETATTR in the future", but I don't see how given that it's an ip.access specific message and this is what nanoBTS expects.
I don't remember all the details, but I think I wrote this testcase looking at how nanoBTS behaves in such situations. Can you re-test and clarify its behavior?
Patch Set #2, Line 23: Change-Id: I10df611f0086d34a5482f7c8a79703938313ab3d
Related: OS#5964
To view, visit change 32269. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.