Attention is currently required from: pespin.

View Change

1 comment:

• File tests/osmo_io/osmo_io_test.c:

  • Patch Set #12, Line 99: for (int i = 0; i < 128; i++)

    cannot we free the queue_entry upon osmo_iofd_free() after closing the io_uring instance?

    In osmo_iofd_free() I could close/abort the sqe and do a blocking wait for the entry to complete.
    But uring doesn't guarantee which entry completes when and I could be handed a read/write submission from a *different* iofd which I would then need to handle right there and then.

To view, visit change 32536. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.