Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
1 comment:
Commit Message:
and there
is no way for the PFCPEM to correlate which session belongs to which eNB.
If we cannot find a good PFCP IE to include such identity information in, 3GPP TS 29.244 Section 5.9 states we may add vendor-specific IEs anywhere and any implementation not understanding them shall just ignore them:
Vendor-specific IE may be sent with any PFCP message. Vendor-specific IE may be added directly to a PFCP message, or by embedding it into a grouped IE.
In a network with Vendor specific enhancements, unrecognized vendor specific IEs shall be handled as unknown optional IEs.
In terms of 3GPP standard IEs, we could include the IMSI of the UE in the "User ID" IE (29.244 Section 8.2.101) for the PFCP session establish request. This would at least allow us to support "one concurrent session establishment per UE". That should be fine for your current use case? With multiple different bearers (like establishing a video call with different voice + video bearers) that may not be sufficient itself...
To view, visit change 38206. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.