Attention is currently required from: neels.
6 comments:
Commit Message:
Patch Set #1, Line 27: a separate SCCP CR without payload.
Not sure if it really makes sense to use any value != 0 here,so it probably makes more sense to have a VTY config option which actually defines whether a SCCP CR is decoupled from the RANAP message?
File include/osmocom/hnbgw/context_map.h:
Patch Set #1, Line 42: RUA_CN_DomainIndicator_t cached_domain_indicator;
isn't this the same as is_ps?
File src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c:
Patch Set #1, Line 139: rc = rua_to_scu(map->hnb_ctx, map->cached_domain_indicator, OSMO_SCU_PRIM_N_DATA,
you can probably use map->is_ps here instead of adding map->cached_domain_indicator
File src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw.c:
Patch Set #1, Line 93: gw->config.max_sccp_cr_payload_len = 999999;
this really looks like a hack. Use -1 value and a "no sccp..." VTY command. Or rather simply change the VTY command to be a boolean.
File src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_rua.c:
Patch Set #1, Line 274: if (data && len && map && !map->is_ps && !release_context_map) {
This new check looks non related? why did you add it?
Patch Set #1, Line 417: map->cached_domain_indicator = ies.cN_DomainIndicator;
as mentioned, this is not needed, the info is in "is_ps".
To view, visit change 28230. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.