Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin, daniel, lynxis lazus.
1 comment:
Patchset:
I'm not against merging this patch, but I'm raising the topic since we seem to merging a feature whi […]
and I'm not against keeping the functionality clean, and I'm all for questioning the need for patches and for hearing more voices on it.
That said, I'm stumped to know how the code would automatically know on which site the operator would like to reject [not found at this time in dGSM] IMSIs with CONGESTION and on which sites with "ROAMING NOT ALLOWED".
Maybe if I include libosmo-chatgpt.h
;-)
Also, I don't see that this patch, or any other for that matter, that does not change default behaviour, but rather adds an OPTIONAL vty param that the user is free to ignore, creates a need for the user to configure it.
I am now more curious about what lynxis' motivation at 36c3 was. I sort of remember something about it.
To view, visit change 16808. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.