Time to Switching Frequence

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/UmTRX@lists.osmocom.org/.

Andrey Sviyazov andreysviyaz at gmail.com
Fri Jun 7 12:36:39 UTC 2013


Well.
It is Tx carrier frequency, which is typically below the modulated signal
on 40..60 dB.
You can see it on spectrum analyzer when there are no modulation.

Best regards,
Andrey Sviyazov.


2013/6/7 jiangwy <wyjiang at ljshuoda.com>

> **
> Hi Andrey.
>
> I see. But what's the TxLO leakage?
>
> ------------------------------
> jiangwy
>
>  *From:* Andrey Sviyazov <andreysviyaz at gmail.com>
> *Date:* 2013-06-07 19:14
> *To:* wyjiang <wyjiang at ljshuoda.com>
> *CC:* umtrx <umtrx at lists.osmocom.org>; Chemeris Alexander<alexander.chemeris at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Time to Switching Frequence
>
> Hi Jiang.
>
> Sorry, I missed that you'll use only receivers.
> So, no any problems in this case.
>
> Best regards,
> Andrey Sviyazov.
> (Sent from my mobile client)
> 07.06.2013 14:54 пользователь "Andrey Sviyazov" <andreysviyaz at gmail.com>
> написал:
>
>> Hi Jiang.
>>
>> Please remember that Rx and Tx of LMS can't work well at the same
>> frequency due to PLL's problems.
>> Also, please do not forget about TxLO leakage which is quite significant.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andrey Sviyazov.
>> (Sent from my mobile client)
>> 07.06.2013 14:36 пользователь "jiangwy" <wyjiang at ljshuoda.com> написал:
>>
>>> **
>>> OK.
>>> Thank you and Sylvain very much!
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> jiangwy
>>>
>>>  *From:* Alexander Chemeris <alexander.chemeris at gmail.com>
>>> *Date:* 2013-06-07 18:12
>>> *To:* wyjiang <wyjiang at ljshuoda.com>
>>> *CC:* UmTRX <umtrx at lists.osmocom.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Time to Switching Frequence
>>>  Jiang,
>>>
>>> It's not tested. LMS6002D chip by itself has quite short tuning time,
>>> but the current host and FPGA code introduce significant delay. I
>>> can't find exact numbers regarding LMS tuning time, but IIRC it was
>>> shorter than a GSM timeslot.
>>>
>>> So, as Sylvain said, given software limitations it's easier to use two
>>> channels of UmTRX to receive on two frequencies.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:21 AM, jiangwy <wyjiang at ljshuoda.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>>
>>> > I have a project to monitoring ( air sniffer ) the data between GSM BTS and
>>> > MS using UmTRX.
>>>
>>> > Uplink Transmission is delayed 3 slots than downlink from specification.
>>>
>>> > So when I sync. with BTS and get the downlink slot data, I must switch the
>>> > freqs of receiver from downlink to uplink in less than 2 slots.
>>>
>>> > When the program call 'usrp_dev->set_rx_freq(wFreq)', How much time does the
>>> > UmTRX switch to the 'wFreq' ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks in advance.
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Jiang WenYi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Alexander Chemeris.
>>> CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио
>>> http://fairwaves.ru
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/umtrx/attachments/20130607/a25e25ae/attachment.htm>


More information about the UmTRX mailing list