This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/UmTRX@lists.osmocom.org/.
Thomas Tsou tom at tsou.ccOn Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Alexander Chemeris <alexander.chemeris at gmail.com> wrote: > And this leads us to the question that POWEROFF in the umtrx_dual_test > is not implemented at all. This is not a problem caused by the dual_trx branch. POWEROFF has never been implemented in _any_ branch. It has been always been dummy command since the first OpenBTS release. The dual_trx branch does maintain slightly stricter state variables in order to manage shared resource control, and may return more error conditions (instead of ignoring them). That's the likely the cause of different behaviour. Yes, as you know, it's a major problem and the transceiver code doesn't release resources in a sane way. Shutdown is broken, and it always has been. > Thomas, could you please rebase the umtrx_dual_test onto the recent > "fairwaves/master" branch? The DriveLoop/Transceiver split breaks a > number of patches and it would be better if you do it yourself. I will do that. Thomas