UmTRX Digest, Vol 4, Issue 35

Andrey Sviyazov andreysviyaz at gmail.com
Mon Oct 29 10:25:18 UTC 2012


Hi Jean-Samuel.

You are absolutely right.
But I see that price in Russia market around $150.
And you should agree that it Is not such cheap as we wish.
So, using 100MB LAN per UmTRX board and internal PoE
for -40..+75C seem realistic to be implemented in future.
On other hand we can start to design openPoE project :)

Best regards,
Andrey Sviyazov.



2012/10/29 Andrey Sviyazov <andreysviyaz at gmail.com>

> Yes, be sure, I know why we need POE.
> If we no more need outdoor then I agree.
> And it will be separate design because we'll never get -40C as we need now.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Andrey Sviyazov.
> P.S.
> I mean why "Re: UmTRX Digest, Vol 4, Issue 35" ?
>
>
> 2012/10/29 Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Andrey Sviyazov
>> <andreysviyaz at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 1) POE components still very expensive for 1GBe and -40 deg C.
>>
>> Well as Alexander pointed out, I think PoE makes more sense in short
>> range pico cell applications and I'm not sure the whole temp range is
>> such an issue for those applications.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>     Sylvain
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/umtrx/attachments/20121029/9e8d2d2e/attachment.html>


More information about the UmTRX mailing list