Selectivity improvement solutions proposal for UmTRX

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/UmTRX@lists.osmocom.org/.

Andrey Sviyazov andreysviyaz at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 08:30:05 UTC 2012


Hi Alexander.

Actualy I don't know side-type connectors for cable.
I suggested you PCB side connector (like PCI) for debugging only.
Moreover, there are a lot SMD connectors for IDC flat cable, BHS-10 for
example.

Best regards,
Andrey Sviyazov.



19 марта 2012 г. 10:14 пользователь Alexander Chemeris <
alexander.chemeris at gmail.com> написал:

> Andrey,
>
> 2012/3/19 Andrey Sviyazov <andreysviyaz at gmail.com>:
> > 5) Regarding connectors, I only can suggest to use the two angle
> SMA-female
> > connectors for outputs which will stick out through the panel of the
> housing
> > (as you can use the angle SMA connectors, but for GPS and CLK_I/O on the
> > UmTRX board). At the same time for the internal 4 connectors we can use
> some
> > cheap like U.FL and cable assemblies U.FL-MCX or  U.FL-U.FL. Signal
> > CLK_26MHz,  6.5VDC, SPI and Switch controls will go via IDC control
> > connector.
>
> IDC connectors on a UmTRX and on a RF board will be connected with a
> flat ribbon cable?
>
> Why don't you want to use a side connector?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Alexander Chemeris.
> CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио
> http://fairwaves.ru
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/umtrx/attachments/20120319/b77d10a8/attachment.htm>


More information about the UmTRX mailing list