This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/UmTRX@lists.osmocom.org/.
Thomas Tsou tom at tsou.ccOn Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Alexander Chemeris <alexander.chemeris at gmail.com> wrote: >> No, not yet. I tried some other combinations that worked fine on the >> signal tester, but the handset still wasn't happy. I'm not yet sure >> why. > > Did you check power mask with the signal tester, or phase error too? > May be differential modulation is somehow broken by this change? The modified case I measured earlier was improved in power mask and phase error, but just failed in real testing. There is an overall phase rotation from the added bits, but this technically shouldn't matter - and adding only the trailing bits also caused the failure condition. My guess is that this is ramp/power related and not directly due to modulation. My power shaping profile was really a coarse guesstimate, so that may be a factor. But I'm surprised it doesn't work because having no power profile seems to work quite well (without the extra bits). Thomas