This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-sdr@lists.osmocom.org/.
David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.orgOn Thu, 2018-06-28 at 20:29 +0200, Steve Markgraf wrote: > Hi David, > > On 28.06.2018 17:43, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > With just 'inline', if the compiler decides not to inline them, it isn't > > required to emit them at all. For some targets with -Os that is causing > > build failures. > > "It isn't required to emit them at all" - What the heck, which compiler > on earth does such horrible things? > > I've taken at look at the C99 standard for the function specifier > 'inline' and there is nothing that would justify such behaviour. > > Of course, if that's a bug with a specific compiler version we can merge > that, but the explanation in the commit doesn't make any sense to me. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86360 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5213 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-sdr/attachments/20180629/9e91a411/attachment.bin>