This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-sdr@lists.osmocom.org/.
Nikos Balkanas nikos.balkanas at eyeonix.comOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Alexandru Csete <oz9aec at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Sdr Guru <sdrguru1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Alexandru Csete <oz9aec at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Sdr Guru <sdrguru1 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > Perhaps you can add a simple performance test to rtl_fm. > >> > "decoding 100000 samples takes xxx ms" or something like that. > >> > It helps to compare different CPU and OS families. > >> > >> We can already do simple benchmarking using the "time" command, or > >> more detailed measurements using the "perf" tool that comes with the > >> linux kernel. > > > > You can bring us some examples. Or write a guide. > > Especially with "time" command. > > In a terminal you type: > > time rtl_fm > > with the rtl_fm parameters you want to use. When you stop the program > it will print out how much real time has passed and how much time was > used by the application. See "man time" for options. > Not the best way, unless you print #of packets processed and cpu is limiting. A better choice would be gprof (Linux). Nikos > Alex > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-sdr/attachments/20140130/73180f71/attachment.htm>