This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-sdr@lists.osmocom.org/.
Sdr Guru sdrguru1 at gmail.comHi Perhaps you can add a simple performance test to rtl_fm. "decoding 100000 samples takes xxx ms" or something like that. It helps to compare different CPU and OS families. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:19 PM, keenerd <keenerd at gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/30/14, Anders Lynge Esbensen <anders at lyes.dk> wrote: > > Hi and thanks for a great tool set. > > > > I've implemented a faster FM demodulator for rlt_fm. Its an > > instantaneous frequency demodulator, like the already implemented atan > > method, but it uses some math tricks to get rid of the the actual atan > > calculation. Feel free to use it if you wish > > Nice, thank you. > > It should probably be under the -A option with all the other types of > FM demodulator math. Maybe benchmark it against the other FM > demodulators, "-A fast" or "-A lut". The default "-A std" was not > designed to be very quick, just accurate. Being faster than "-A std" > is not very difficult. > > Let me see if I can get a fixed-point version written. > > -Kyle > http://kmkeen.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-sdr/attachments/20140130/c549639e/attachment.htm>