Another failure of decoding UAT

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-sdr@lists.osmocom.org/.

Nikos Balkanas nikos.balkanas at eyeonix.com
Wed Jan 22 10:35:35 UTC 2014


Have you checked your hardware? Mostly antenna and grounds...

BR,
Nikos


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev at kotori.zaitcev.us>wrote:

> Guys,
>
> As you know, our sample rate is not good enough to decode UAT's FSK in
> a conventional way, so I thought to try something else: use 2 samples
> per bit to detect the frequency shift. This is obviously unreliable,
> but I hoped to see something at least. But it didn't work: seems like
> decoding noise.
>
> The code is here:
>  https://github.com/zaitcev/ruat
>
> Anyone is willing to critique? Where did I go wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> -- Pete
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-sdr/attachments/20140122/05382b20/attachment.htm>


More information about the osmocom-sdr mailing list