This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 04:00:14PM +0100, Manuel José Muñoz Calero wrote: > I am evaluating these days the possibility to do something interesting > which could be used as my project and also to put my bit for the OpenGGSN > project. Well, my opinion is that OpenGGSN has fairly bad code structuring. It has heavy use of code duplication and the code layers aren't separated well (e.g. I can't use libgtp to decode messages without also using its tx/rx). So a proper audit and spring cleaning might be a nice project, if not necessarily super exciting, at least it is well defined in that OpenGGSN should not (or hardly) change behavior while making the code safer / easier to maintain / more versatile to re-use. You could analyse the code structures and/or security holes, academically argue why they are bad and come up with improvements, while using and/or writing tests to ensure correctness. If you know your stuff, all OpenGGSN users would arguably benefit from that. I'd like to do that if I had the time, but that will probably never be the case. I'm too busy writing new bugs for 3G :P That's just my sixpence -- good speed for your project, whichever you chose! :) ~Neels -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-net-gprs/attachments/20160322/93c37834/attachment.bin>