This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.
Ivan Kluchnikov Ivan.Kluchnikov at fairwaves.ruHi Holger and Andreas, I agree with Andreas, actually most of the code is c, not c++, so I think that the right solution is to get rid of с++ completely. Andreas, if you have patches for that and time, I believe that it make sense to create new branch with these patches. After that I can try to turn dissecting part from c++ to c. What do you think about it? 2013/7/29 Andreas Eversberg <andreas at eversberg.eu> > Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > From my point > > of view we are taking the hit of g++ without really using any of the > > features that C++ vould provide (e.g. no stack variables with automatic > > cleanup..). > > > hi holger, > > i have some old patches somewhere that turn everything from c++ to c, > except the dissecting part, which stays c++, iirc. i never finished > them, because there was someone doing a similar work, so i didn't want > to do double work. in my opinion it makes sense to change it, since we > don't (and won't) use any c++ features at our code. > > > I think we should find a more nice solution to extern "C". > that would be my solution. if you like, i could dig these patches out. > > regards, > > andreas > > > > > -- Regards, Ivan Kluchnikov. http://fairwaves.ru -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-net-gprs/attachments/20130730/c30f4c0c/attachment.htm>