<div dir="auto">I completely support extension of the line with. 80 characters limit is very annoying these days. 120 is a good number.<br><br><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Please excuse typos. Written with a touchscreen keyboard.<br><br>--<br>Regards,<br>Alexander Chemeris<br>CTO/Founder Fairwaves, Inc.<br><a href="https://fairwaves.co">https://fairwaves.co</a></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Apr 1, 2017 12:45, "Harald Welte" <<a href="mailto:laforge@gnumonks.org">laforge@gnumonks.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br>
<br>
[Despite today being April 1st, this is not an april fool's joke]<br>
<br>
ever since the start of the Osmocom project, we have adopted pretty much<br>
1:1 the Linux Kernel coding style.<br>
<br>
Having a uniform coding style all over the project is important for<br>
readability, and from my point of view it doesn't really matter too much<br>
which style it is, as long as it is uniform accross the projects.<br>
<br>
I'm still fine with the Linux kernel coding style for most parts, but I<br>
think we could consider allowing longer lines. 80 characters is still<br>
nice here and there, but maybe something like 100, 120 or even 130 might<br>
actually make the code more readable and permit us to use slightly<br>
longer identifiers without having to wrap every second statement in the<br>
code.<br>
<br>
What do people generally think here?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Harald<br>
<br>
--<br>
- Harald Welte <<a href="mailto:laforge@gnumonks.org">laforge@gnumonks.org</a>> <a href="http://laforge.gnumonks.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://laforge.gnumonks.org/</a><br>
==============================<wbr>==============================<wbr>================<br>
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."<br>
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)<br>
</blockquote></div></div>