This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at osmocom.orgHi Neels,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 08:18:52AM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 02:45:42AM +0000, scan-admin at coverity.com wrote:
> > >>> CID 240103: (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT)
> > >>> "val < -9223372036854775808LL /* -9223372036854775807L - 1 */" is always false regardless of the values of its operands. This occurs as the logical operand of "if".
> > 1434 if (val < INT64_MIN) {
> > 1435 if (result)
> > 1436 *result = INT64_MIN;
> > 1437 return -ERANGE;
> > 1438 }
>
> Yes I know, but is it guaranteed on all archs in past and future that long long int is 64 bit?
it seems anything except IBM 370, PDP-11 etc. from that area (which has no long long)
has long long int as 64bit in the future who knows, maybe it gets even longer, who knows.
> I'd just ignore these warnings if that's ok with everyone else.
Wouldn't they go away with a simple change from INT64_MIN/MAX to LLONG_MIN/MAX?
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)