This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 06:30:14PM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > > IIUC, in the traditional core network. When an MSC receives a MO SETUP > > from a local MS, and it does not have this number in the VLR, it should > > be querying HLR for routing info, (which may subsequently query another > > HLR) no? why are we only doing VLR lookup in the MSC? Is it simply "To > > be implemented" ? > > Yes, these are leftovers of the OsmoNITB paradigm, being "I am the entire core > network". If a subscriber isn't attached, it doesn't exist. Let me rephrase: back then the subscriber database was in the OsmoNITB and non-attached subscribers did exist. The inability to recognise unattached subscribers as existing crept in during the separation of the HLR. ~N -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20190805/1b6f702f/attachment.bin>