This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 04:16:49PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > A transition to "everyone has +2" would be a far more drastic change > than what I was proposing. I believe this would result in less code > review being done than is being done today. In general, the fact that you can do +2 doesn't mean that you're allowed to do it. The normal case would be: the third reviewer coming along sees that there are already two +1s and then is allowed to vote a +2, by convention / trust. I would like to adopt the +3 scheme, only I think we don't necessarily need IU enforcement of it by an obscure plugin, because we can agree on it between us humans. Whenever someone disregards "+3", that is a potential offense. I could trivially enable +2 within minutes right now. No prolog required, only communication. If that doesn't work out, we can still go for the plugin or revert +2 abilities. What do you think? ~N -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20181114/4d392ec2/attachment.bin>