This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deHi Jolly, my current task is to implement load based handover between BTS, and in old tradition of adopting your code to implement dynamic timeslots on osmo-{bts,bsc}, I am now looking at the openbsc.git jolly/new_handover branch. I notice that, on that branch, there are improvements on the "old" handover, followed by a new elaborate handover_2 algorithm, which looks very sane at first sight, paired with an elaborate test suite. So my question is whether handover_2.c has some obvious shortcomings or open issues that need to be resolved before I can consider merging that to OsmoBSC's master branch. Should we still keep the "old" handover decision code around as well for particular reasons, or would it make sense to adopt handover_2.c by default? Is one better than the other in particular situations? And ... do you remember any high level conclusions from when you implemented the branch, things I should be aware of when testing and adopting the code? Did it work out as expected? How well tested is it? Thanks! ~N -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20171124/65340694/attachment.bin>