osmo-gsm-tester successfully runs {NITB, AoverIP} x {sysmoBTS, B210}

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Tue May 30 00:27:16 UTC 2017


Hi Neels,

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:57:02PM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> Just now I obtained a successful test run of the osmo-gsm-tester with these
> combinations:
> 
>  OsmoNITB                    with sysmoBTS
>  OsmoNITB                    with osmo-bts-trx (Ettus B210)
>  OsmoMSC + OsmoBSC (AoverIP) with sysmoBTS
>  OsmoMSC + OsmoBSC (AoverIP) with osmo-bts-trx (Ettus B210)

this is great news, and I hope we are getting stable, reproducible
results for this.  Might it make sense to simply let the tester run
repeating and repeating the same test with the same software over and
over again to see if it really is reproducible?

In any case, I think next to extending this to more BTS hardware
options, there are the following next steps:
* replicate the development setup on the 1U enclosed production setup
* use the production setup for the official jenkins job
* extend test coverage to go beyond the current very basic tests cases.

Would you agree?

I think a long time once did quite some brainstorming on the kind of
testing that I'd love to see.  Let me see if I can dig that out
somewhere again.  I think there's quite a bit that can be tested even
without voice, purely on the signaling plane.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



More information about the OpenBSC mailing list