This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Neels,
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 04:04:10PM +0100, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> With steve, the name Osmocom-CN has kind of stuck, for osmocom core network.
> But again the HLR is separate and it's not really accurate. Osmocom-CN would
> make sense if we have a joint BSC, MSC, SGSN and HLR repository.
No, it does not make sense seven in that case, because the BSC is not
part of the Core Network.
> But what *is* our intended grouping? I (naively?) tend to like complete
> separation into separate BSC, separate MSC, separate SGSN, because it matches
> the separation that the code is moving towards, and our redmine project tree.
yes, but what do we do until that is reached? It will be quite some
time until there is a stand-alone MSC with A interface.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)