This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Vadim Yanitskiy axilirator at gmail.comHi Neels, > If you submitted a patch for it I would probably +vote it. Not yet. > I guess it would actually be a whole bunch of patches, > a common part in libosmocore and using it in each osmo* program? Probably, it would be a whole bunch of patches for osmo* programs only. I was wondering about modifying libosmovty to enable a new VTY command in all projects, like Harald did in osmo-fsm implementation. But in case of FSM, all state machines are being registered before use, so libosmovty "knows" about them. What is impossible in case of talloc contexts right now. Of course, we can write a new function and register every root talloc context using it. What about that? Regarding to the commands to add, I think show ctx all - Show list of all registered talloc contexts. show ctx NAME - Find specified context and call talloc_report_full. With best regards, Vadim Yanitskiy. 2017-06-01 4:34 GMT+07:00 Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>: > re "what do you guys think about having a special VTY command to get a > talloc report?" > > If you submitted a patch for it I would probably +vote it. I guess it would > actually be a whole bunch of patches, a common part in libosmocore and > using it > in each osmo* program? > > ~N > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20170601/4c8e4351/attachment.htm>