This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Freyther holger at freyther.de> On 17 May 2016, at 11:42, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> wrote: > > > Agreed, and we already have that with the osmocom-commitlog mailing > list. I'm not sure how this list is used in context of the new gerrit > setup. Does it only receive the 'accepted/approved' changes that were > merged into master. Holger? We should definitely still keep pushing > notifications to that list, IMHO. Once it is submitted in Gerrit, it will be replicated to git.osmocom.org at which point the usual commit message will be generated. > and not have those: > >>> all_comments Somebody but jenkins commented > > The "Foo has voded +2" mails are absolutely not aceptable to me. I'd > rather have all comment notifications disabled than to have those on the > list. Even if we can filter, I'm not sure if we want all the comments > on the list or not... Let's take the "moving" of the DTX VTY command from global to per BTS. I said that we should not break old/currently used configuration files, pointed to DEFUN_DEPRECATED and Max found .HIDDEN_STR (.HIDDEN_TEXT?). I think it would still be nice (in terms of learning) to see them even for changes I do not review. Is there a middle ground? A separate mailinglist? Add some code to create a "all_human_comments"? that include a personal comment (and only such?)? holger