fully dynamic TS, naming

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de
Wed Jul 13 17:18:03 UTC 2016


About http://osmocom.org/issues/1757#note-4

With the current naming scheme, the logical name for a fully dynamic
TCH/F-TCH/H-PDCH channel would be

  GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F_TCH_H_PDCH

   timeslot 2
    phys_chan_config  TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH

Is it asking for trouble to just name it DYN instead?

  GSM_PCHAN_DYN

   timeslot 2
    phys_chan_config  DYN

I'm in (at least) two minds about it, opinions welcome...

~Neels

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20160713/864a916f/attachment.bin>


More information about the OpenBSC mailing list