This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Rajitha peiris raji.oshin at hotmail.comanyone know about rbs 2308 is supported yet or not...or still under experimental stage... thanks regards rajitha peiris sri Lanka Sent from my Mi phone On "openbsc-request at lists.osmocom.org" <openbsc-request at lists.osmocom.org>, Dec 7, 2016 11:11 PM wrote: Send OpenBSC mailing list submissions to openbsc at lists.osmocom.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openbsc-request at lists.osmocom.org You can reach the person managing the list at openbsc-owner at lists.osmocom.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of OpenBSC digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Paging not answered in m2m call (Holger Freyther) 2. Re: Paging not answered in m2m call (Kristian Martens) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:13:10 +0100 From: Holger Freyther <holger at freyther.de> To: Kristian Martens <kristian.martens at ng4t.com> Cc: openbsc at lists.osmocom.org Subject: Re: Paging not answered in m2m call Message-ID: <D782A7D5-AD0D-4BE0-9898-2AEC6151BAB0 at freyther.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On 07 Dec 2016, at 17:52, Kristian Martens <kristian.martens at ng4t.com> wrote: > > Hello, Hi! > two UEs (A and B) are successfully registered in a network. Now A tries > to call B. B is paged by the core via A interface but the sysmoBSC/BTS > does not seem to page the UE (or UE does not answer paging). What could > be the reason for this behaviour? How could the problem be debugged? > Please find the attached pcap for your reference. nice MNC! The P-TMSI doesn't really look that random but it might be an index into an internal data structure? So on A this looks right. The LAI is 262-79-1 and this is where you are paging. In general it might be: * osmo-bsc doesn't translate this to actual paging. E.g. not linking/ handling the location area identifier. You could trace the RSL protocol and see if a paging command is being sent (periodically) to the BTS? * The MS still has a radio channel open. I notice that clear command is being sent so this is unlikely to be the case. Also IMSI seems to be match.. maybe the MS still calculates the paging group wrongly? That is far fetched though. holger ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:41:08 +0100 From: Kristian Martens <kristian.martens at ng4t.com> To: Holger Freyther <holger at freyther.de> Cc: openbsc at lists.osmocom.org Subject: Re: Paging not answered in m2m call Message-ID: <9a4bcc68-e884-0f48-8a26-989b7edf5bca at ng4t.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, I have captured a trace. Can you find something out? Thanks, Kristian Am 07.12.2016 um 18:13 schrieb Holger Freyther: >> On 07 Dec 2016, at 17:52, Kristian Martens <kristian.martens at ng4t.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, > Hi! > >> two UEs (A and B) are successfully registered in a network. Now A tries >> to call B. B is paged by the core via A interface but the sysmoBSC/BTS >> does not seem to page the UE (or UE does not answer paging). What could >> be the reason for this behaviour? How could the problem be debugged? >> Please find the attached pcap for your reference. > > nice MNC! The P-TMSI doesn't really look that random but it might be an > index into an internal data structure? > > So on A this looks right. The LAI is 262-79-1 and this is where you are > paging. In general it might be: > > * osmo-bsc doesn't translate this to actual paging. E.g. not linking/ > handling the location area identifier. You could trace the RSL protocol > and see if a paging command is being sent (periodically) to the BTS? > > * The MS still has a radio channel open. I notice that clear command is > being sent so this is unlikely to be the case. Also IMSI seems to be > match.. maybe the MS still calculates the paging group wrongly? That is > far fetched though. > > > holger -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20161207_nopaging.pcap Type: application/octet-stream Size: 26302 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20161207/dccfca29/attachment.obj> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ OpenBSC mailing list OpenBSC at lists.osmocom.org https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc ------------------------------ End of OpenBSC Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7 ************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20161208/5e1bbda1/attachment.htm>