This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgOn Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:50:52PM +0200, Sipos Csaba wrote: > Do you think that these vendor agnostic implementations can cahnge > with the small cell forum API? no. > http://scf.io/en/documents/082_-_LTE_eNB_L1_API_definition.php This is the Layer 1 API between the PHY and the MAC/RLC layer. This is _very_ far from the Iuh interface. Compare it with the L1SAP interface of OsmoBTS. And Iuh is on th level of the A interface, not even Abis. Also, this API is for LTE, not for UMTS. > Do we know any femtos on the market that actually is compatible with > this API? And if we have one, can that help us? You can find transceiver hardware + PHY implementations that offer this L1 API. However, that is not a complete (femto/small) cell, but the hardware plus the PHY. I don't think anyone will quickly come about and implement all the missing layers, so in the context of developing a NITB with Iuh interface, it doesn't really help. > Or maybe you have some specific models in mind you always wanted to > try but never had the time? If you have any recommendations I would be > happy to look into them. I haven't really looked at any femtocells for a very long time. -- - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)