This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Freyther holger at freyther.de> On 21 Nov 2015, at 19:18, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> wrote: > > But in any case, your mail was not a response to my question. What do > you think about it? Was there another question than if we object? I do not object and I think using the system talloc is the right thing to do. I was surprised that the Fedora package didn't raise this issue. >> I think we should remove <osmocom/core/talloc.h> at the same time. > > I think we should keep it as a convenience wrapper just containing a > single line of "#include <talloc.h>". _maybe_ with a #warning together. > > This makes sense for people wanting to build e.g. older branches with > new libosmocore. That wrapper-header doesn't hurt and helps people > avoid broken builds. hmm. okay. But new code should use talloc.h directly then? holger