This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Alvaro Neira Ayuso anayuso at sysmocom.deOn Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:14:07AM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:38:47PM +0200, Alvaro Neira Ayuso wrote: > > From: Álvaro Neira Ayuso <anayuso at sysmocom.de> > > > --- a/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data_shared.h > > +++ b/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data_shared.h > > @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ struct gsm_bts_trx { > > uint16_t arfcn; > > int nominal_power; /* in dBm */ > > unsigned int max_power_red; /* in actual dB */ > > + int power_reduce; /* in dBm */ > > any reason to make it use int and not unsigned int? As this > is a relative value the right unit is dB (take this with a > grain of salt as I am just a software guy) No, I don't have any reason for using int. But I have seen that that it's better to use unsigned int because it's a little bit strange accept to use negative values in a one attribute that we want to use for reducing the power transmitter. I'm going to change that and send you another version. Thanks Holger