This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Peter Stuge peter at stuge.seIvan Kluchnikov wrote: > This is new version of patch for review and merge: > > - more user-friendly interface for command: > rach access-control-class 2 barred > rach access-control-class 11 allowed Yes, much better than before, but perhaps spend the half hour it takes to write that %d-%d parser using sscanf? > +++ b/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_vty.c .. > @@ -2059,6 +2067,51 @@ DEFUN(cfg_bts_rach_ec_allowed, cfg_bts_rach_ec_allowed_cmd, > return CMD_SUCCESS; > } > > +DEFUN(cfg_bts_rach_ac_class, cfg_bts_rach_ac_class_cmd, > + "rach access-control-class (0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|11|12|13|14|15) (barred|allowed)", > + RACH_STR > + "Set access control class\n" > + "Access control class 0\n" > + "Access control class 1\n" > + "Access control class 2\n" > + "Access control class 3\n" > + "Access control class 4\n" > + "Access control class 5\n" > + "Access control class 6\n" > + "Access control class 7\n" > + "Access control class 8\n" > + "Access control class 9\n" > + "Access control class 11 for PLMN use\n" > + "Access control class 12 for security services\n" > + "Access control class 13 for public utilities (e.g. water/gas suppliers)\n" > + "Access control class 14 for emergency services\n" > + "Access control class 15 for PLMN staff\n" > + "barred to use access control class\n" > + "allowed to use access control class\n") > +{ Is that long array of strings correct? //Peter