This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Nordin bouchtaoui at gmail.comOn 24-2-2011 8:54, Omar Atia wrote: > Dears,, > > > > In addition to the below question , first what do you mean by 24 AMPS ?, 2nd > Does ipaccess covers up to 25 KM or it needs amplifiers or one ipaccess > antenna can cover that distance can you explain? For such a distance you need special amplifiers and antennas. It works as Stuart said, he told that from his experience. > > > Thanks, > > Omar Atia > > > > From: openbsc-bounces at lists.osmocom.org > [mailto:openbsc-bounces at lists.osmocom.org] On Behalf Of Maradona Mossiba > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:41 PM > To: Stuart Baggs > Cc: OpenBSC list; Nordin > Subject: Re: Timing Advance > > > > Ok cool, thnx Stuart. > Is this info based on technical specs of the 139 model? > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stuart Baggs<stuart at bluewave.im> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > The ip.access nanoBTS (at least model 139) do implement timing advance. We > have used them in a macro network coupled with 24 AMPS for nearly a year now > and they work quite effectively. They work right up to the 25 KM timing > advance limit. > > Kind Regards > > Stuart Baggs > > BlueWave Communications Ltd - Suppliers of IP pico/femto cells. > > > On 22 Feb 2011, at 15:08, Nordin wrote: > >> Hello guys, >> >> I haven't been busy with openbsc for a while, however, I was following the > mailing-list. >> I have the following question, is timing advance also implemented for the > nanoBTS? Cause I don't really know where to look in the sources, thank you. >> > > > > >