VTY Crash due an assumption we are breaking

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Holger Hans Peter Freyther holger at freyther.de
Wed Aug 11 17:52:11 UTC 2010


On 08/12/2010 01:40 AM, Harald Welte wrote:
]
> that sound useful.  Or we do something like |= some high bit to indicate it is
> a sub-node of enable or config.

This sounds like a good idea. I will see how the number for the NODE is used
within the vty (hopefully not to determine the size of the vectors) and then
add a bit and a mask to the vty code...




More information about the OpenBSC mailing list