This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Freyther zecke at selfish.orgOn Wednesday 30 September 2009 14:49:21 Harald Welte wrote: > Hi Zecke, > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:37:42PM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 September 2009 13:23:10 Harald Welte wrote: > > > You are now redefiniing the LAC 0 to something like the opposite case, > > > which I don't particularly like. Is there some alternative solution? > > > > I didn't think about the IMSI DETACH case. One easy alternative is to use > > the other reserved lac value. With the least significant bit set 0 and > > all others to 1 (so 0xfffe... ETSI always makes me unsure about it). > > I think LAC = 0xfffe seems to be the way to go for paging of all BTS, wile > we keep LAC = 0 for the 'user is detached' case. Okay, I have added a change set, please check if you are okay with it. holger