This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Roch-Alexandre Nomine roch at on-waves.comHi Harald, I might be wrong but I think that ip.access only supports AMR for half-rate channels. Regards Roch. Roch-Alexandre NOMINÉ CTO On-Waves ehf Ármúli 25, IS-108 Reykjavík, ICELAND Tel: +354 864 9431 Harald Welte a écrit : > Hi Andreas + List, > > I have now studied the new "RTP capable" lcr integration in detail. My > sincere apologies once again for the long delay that this has been taking > me. > > I really like the interface (like its predecessor). The major restriction > at the moment seems to be its limitation to support only GSM Version 1 > Full Rate. > > After doing some testing with the current 'lcr_rtp' branch in git, as well > as the attempt to integrate handover support with the lcr/mncc interface, > I am considering to add support for other codec types, too. > > GSM EFR (only exists in full-rate) is interesting for everyone, as almost > all phones support it, and it renders significantly higher quality. > > GSM V1 halfrate is important for BS-11 users who want increased capacity, since > this BTS does not support AMR-halfrate. > > GSM V1 full-rate is important for ip.access, since it is the only half-rate > codec it supports, and thus the only way to increase capacity for this BTS. > > GSM AMR full-rate is probably of the least interest, but still nice to have. > > For the 26C3, I would love to run in a EFR-fullrate and AMR-halfrate > configuration, depending on the phone's capabilities. > > Regards, > Harald >