From romain.fliedel at gmail.com Mon Aug 1 13:00:09 2011 From: romain.fliedel at gmail.com (Fliedel Romain) Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:00:09 +0200 Subject: dectmon how to ? Message-ID: <4E36A359.2020203@gmail.com> Hi again, Since I got the pcap to work with dect I'm trying to capture traffic between a handset and its base. I've been able to find my FP with dect-llme-scan (as specified here http://dect.osmocom.org/trac/dect/wiki/Configuration), but now I'd like to lock to this FP and capture the traffic with wireshark. I've used the dectmon utility but it's locking to other FP. Is there a way to lock to a specific FP ? Is there a how to somewhere for capturing traffic ? Thanks again, Romain From kaber at trash.net Wed Aug 3 15:16:55 2011 From: kaber at trash.net (Patrick McHardy) Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:16:55 +0200 Subject: dectmon how to ? In-Reply-To: <4E36A359.2020203@gmail.com> References: <4E36A359.2020203@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4E396667.1040108@trash.net> On 01.08.2011 15:00, Fliedel Romain wrote: > Hi again, > > Since I got the pcap to work with dect I'm trying to capture traffic > between a handset and its base. > I've been able to find my FP with dect-llme-scan (as specified here > http://dect.osmocom.org/trac/dect/wiki/Configuration), but now I'd like > to lock to this FP and capture the traffic with wireshark. > I've used the dectmon utility but it's locking to other FP. > > Is there a way to lock to a specific FP ? You can configure the FP with a specific EMC/FPN and start dectmon without scanning mode to lock to a specific FP. > Is there a how to somewhere for capturing traffic ? By default it just decodes traffic. It can capture traffic and save the raw frames, but it can't read it back so far. Someone should add pcap support for reading and writing packets ... From tobias.seufert at web.de Mon Aug 1 19:18:33 2011 From: tobias.seufert at web.de (Tobias Seufert) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:18:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: pairing problem Message-ID: <153083510.2534439.1312226313541.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb046> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kaber at trash.net Wed Aug 3 15:08:10 2011 From: kaber at trash.net (Patrick McHardy) Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:08:10 +0200 Subject: pairing problem In-Reply-To: <153083510.2534439.1312226313541.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb046> References: <153083510.2534439.1312226313541.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb046> Message-ID: <4E39645A.5090006@trash.net> On 01.08.2011 21:18, Tobias Seufert wrote: > Hey all, > > i encountered a problem by trying to pair my dect-phone with the COM-ON-AIR-CARD > in fp mode. > My configuration is the same as in the configuration-wiki. I enabled the dect > access-rights in Asterisk CLI. > > The error displayed is the following: > > LCE: link -1 (RELEASED): alloc > LCE: link 18 (ESTABLISHED): start : SDU timer > LCE: link 18 (ESTABLISHED): new link: PMID: ef43f LCN: 0 LLN: 1 SAPI: 0 > LCE: RX: 05 44 05 07 80 a8 00 fa 67 f4 3f 0a 03 01 48 00 |.D......g.?...H.| > LCE: RX: 63 03 c2 82 84 78 03 03 51 21 |c....x..Q!| > LCE: link 18 (ESTABLISHED): stop : SDU timer > LCE: link 18 (ESTABLISHED): new transaction: protocol: Mobility Management F: 0 > TV: 0 > MM: unknown transaction: msg type: 44 > LCE: link 18 (ESTABLISHED): confirm transaction: Mobility Management TV: 0 Role: 1 > MM: link 18 (none): ACCESS-RIGHTS-REQUEST > MM: link 18 (none): respond to procedure: access rights priority: 3 > parse {MM-ACCESS-RIGHTS-REQUEST} message &nb sp; > IE: <> id: 5 len: 9 dst: 0x8cce850 > type: IPUI (0) > PUT: N (IPEI) > EMC: 0fa6 > PSN: 7f43f > IE: <> id: a len: 5 dst: 0x8ce9e40 > authentication algorithm: DSAA (1) > authentication key type: Authentication code (4) > authentication key number: 8 > cipher key number: 0 > INC: 0 DEF: 0 TXC: 0 UPC: 0 > IE: <> id: 63 len: 5 dst: 0x8c795f0 > display c apability: numeric (2) > tone capability: complete DECT tones (4) > echo parameters: not applicable (0) > noise rejection capability: not applicable (0) > adaptive volume control provision: not applicable (0) > *** buffer overflow detected ***: ./asterisk terminated > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x50)[0xb7820df0] > /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0xe4cca)[0xb781fcca] > /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0xe45e9)[0xb781f5e9] > /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__snprintf_chk+0x34)[0xb781f4d4] > /usr/lib/libdect.so.0(+0x1e9b3)[0xb6ced9b3] > /usr/lib/libdect.so.0(+0x9b24)[0xb6cd8b24] > /usr/lib/libdect.so.0(dect_parse_sfmt_ie+0xc2)[0xb6cd94f2] & nbsp; Please try running asterisk under valgrind (using -f to make it stay in the foreground). From romain.fliedel at gmail.com Fri Aug 12 15:53:21 2011 From: romain.fliedel at gmail.com (Romain Fliedel) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:53:21 +0200 Subject: Siemens proprietary protocol Message-ID: Hi, I'm trying to understand siemens proprietary protocol and I'd like to add some data on the wiki (add new pcap, and dumps). How do I create an account on the wiki ? (it asks for a login/password) Does someone have pcaps for other siemens phones ? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kaber at trash.net Sat Aug 13 10:57:37 2011 From: kaber at trash.net (Patrick McHardy) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:57:37 +0200 Subject: Siemens proprietary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E4658A1.7060505@trash.net> On 12.08.2011 17:53, Romain Fliedel wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to understand siemens proprietary protocol and I'd like to add > some data on the wiki (add new pcap, and dumps). Great, thanks. > How do I create an account on the wiki ? (it asks for a login/password) > Does someone have pcaps for other siemens phones ? I don't think you can create one yourself, I'll add one and send you the data. From bongio87 at yahoo.it Sat Aug 13 08:25:26 2011 From: bongio87 at yahoo.it (luca bongiorni) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:25:26 +0100 (BST) Subject: Will the LMX3161 be supported in the future? Message-ID: <1313223926.63333.YahooMailClassic@web29606.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Hi guys, have you find a solution for LMX3161 to be fully supported? Regards Luca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kaber at trash.net Sat Aug 13 10:56:08 2011 From: kaber at trash.net (Patrick McHardy) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:56:08 +0200 Subject: Will the LMX3161 be supported in the future? In-Reply-To: <1313223926.63333.YahooMailClassic@web29606.mail.ird.yahoo.com> References: <1313223926.63333.YahooMailClassic@web29606.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4E465848.3090700@trash.net> On 13.08.2011 10:25, luca bongiorni wrote: > Hi guys, > > have you find a solution for LMX3161 to be fully supported? I haven't tried in quite a while, but if Rick still has the code I was working on, it should be nearly complete. From bongio87 at yahoo.it Sat Aug 13 11:01:45 2011 From: bongio87 at yahoo.it (luca bongiorni) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:01:45 +0100 (BST) Subject: Will the LMX3161 be supported in the future? In-Reply-To: <4E465848.3090700@trash.net> Message-ID: <1313233305.56489.YahooMailClassic@web29605.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Hi Patrick, actually i have both Type II and Type III, so if you or someone else will push on github or in dedected's svn, the sources, i will be happy to give a look into that and trying to be usefull to reach our goal. Cheers Luca I haven't tried in quite a while, but if Rick still has the code I was working on, it should be nearly complete. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kaber at trash.net Sat Aug 13 11:10:14 2011 From: kaber at trash.net (Patrick McHardy) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:10:14 +0200 Subject: Will the LMX3161 be supported in the future? In-Reply-To: <1313233305.56489.YahooMailClassic@web29605.mail.ird.yahoo.com> References: <1313233305.56489.YahooMailClassic@web29605.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4E465B96.90801@trash.net> On 13.08.2011 13:01, luca bongiorni wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > actually i have both Type II and Type III, so if you or someone else will push on github or in dedected's svn, the sources, i will be happy to give a look into that and trying to be usefull to reach our goal. Let's see whether Rick still has my code. IIRC it was complete, but the firmware part wasn't working properly yet, it didn't receive any frames. If you want to work on this I can give you a few pointers to documentation and what needs to be done. From bongio87 at yahoo.it Sat Aug 13 11:39:28 2011 From: bongio87 at yahoo.it (luca bongiorni) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:39:28 +0100 (BST) Subject: Will the LMX3161 be supported in the future? In-Reply-To: <4E465B96.90801@trash.net> Message-ID: <1313235568.80069.YahooMailClassic@web29618.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Hi Patrick, >Let's see whether Rick still has my code. Ok. >IIRC it was complete, but the firmware part wasn't working properly yet, it didn't >receive any frames. If you want to work on this I can give you >a few pointers to documentation and what needs to be done. Would be great, thank you. Cheers Luca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From allarddijk at hotmail.com Sun Aug 21 18:07:53 2011 From: allarddijk at hotmail.com (Allard Dijk) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:07:53 +0200 Subject: Will the LMX3161 be supported in the future? Message-ID: Hi Patrick, Maybe I can join the work on some of your type III card pointers and reduce some of the workload. As Sr. Software engineer at a government R&D department(embedded/vhdl), I have experience with implementing many protocols. Best regards, Allard On 13.08.2011 13:01, luca bongiorni wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > actually i have both Type II and Type III, so if you or someone else will push on github or in dedected's svn, the sources, i will be happy to give a look into that and trying to be usefull to reach our goal. Let's see whether Rick still has my code. IIRC it was complete, but the firmware part wasn't working properly yet, it didn't receive any frames. If you want to work on this I can give you a few pointers to documentation and what needs to be done. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From allarddijk at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 12:22:59 2011 From: allarddijk at hotmail.com (Allard Dijk) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:22:59 +0200 Subject: Cleanup Trac Tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, I removed all the spam-tickets from Trac. Can you check if the status of the remaining tickets is correct? At the moment I dont have the option to remove spam from real tickets, is this possible? Best regards, Allard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kaber at trash.net Tue Aug 23 12:52:38 2011 From: kaber at trash.net (Patrick McHardy) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:52:38 +0200 Subject: Cleanup Trac Tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E53A296.8030405@trash.net> Am 23.08.2011 14:22, schrieb Allard Dijk: > Hello, > > I removed all the spam-tickets from Trac. Can you check if the status of > the remaining tickets is correct? I'll have a look, thanks! > At the moment I dont have the option to remove spam from real tickets, > is this possible? Not sure, I'd have to check myself. I'm probably going to be unresponsive for the remaining week though since we're currently having the netfilter developer conference. From kaber at trash.net Sat Aug 13 10:58:17 2011 From: kaber at trash.net (Patrick McHardy) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:58:17 +0200 Subject: dect.osmocom.org Wiki accounts Message-ID: <4E4658C9.8000701@trash.net> Since Romain already asked for it, if someone wants Wiki accounts on dect.osmocom.org for adding new content, just send me an email. From allarddijk at hotmail.com Sun Aug 28 15:08:34 2011 From: allarddijk at hotmail.com (Allard Dijk) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 17:08:34 +0200 Subject: can we please make spammers harder to post new tickets? Message-ID: Hi, On avg. we get 2 spam tickets a day on Trac. Can you add some level of spam protection to add a ticket? *CAPTCHA *login required < this barrier is the quickest... (and is the same as other osmocom tracs) *changed ticket flow ( ticket not visible before approval) Best, Allard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laforge at gnumonks.org Sun Aug 28 18:51:11 2011 From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 20:51:11 +0200 Subject: can we please make spammers harder to post new tickets? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110828185111.GE23789@prithivi.gnumonks.org> Hi all, On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:08:34PM +0200, Allard Dijk wrote: > On avg. we get 2 spam tickets a day on Trac. Can you add some level of > spam protection to add a ticket? as Patrick is currently busy with the netfilter workshop, I have removed TICKET_{CREATE,APPEND} for anonymous users. I've also deleted tickets 22-75 as well as 77-84 In the process I also discovered that the trac.db is _very_ large (5.1GB) since it contains all the changes of a linux kernel .git tree going back to when Linus started to use git. I guess this might experience some of the performance problems I'm sometimes experiencing on the machine... Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)